I know I started
this series in April; I'll see if I can pick it up again now.
This city is the Garden of Eden, remade. The City is the fulfilment of the purposes of the Eden of God. We began in a garden but will end in a city; God's purpose for humanity is urban! Why? So the city is God's invention and design, not just a sociological phenomenon or invention of humankind. (Emphasis added by me).
Now, I want to begin by saying that I really appreciate Dr. Keller's thinking (and action) around urban church mission, and I also understand that he's countering a widely-held view that sees cities as inherently negative and causes Christians to try to avoid them. I'll also say that I was profoundly influenced by his thinking on this to move my family from the rural fringe to an urban area a few years ago.
However, I want to propose three reasons why I don't feel comfortable with an understanding of the grand storyline of the Bible being bound up in a move from garden to city - why I don't think that God's purpose for humanity is urban:
- The Bible gives us a more complex picture; cities are not always presented as arising due to the will of God.
- For most of human history prior to 2010, and for most of the world's population, life is more rural than urban.
- Dr. Keller's thesis fits like a glove for the American cultural scenario, but that may not make it God's purpose.
1. The complex Biblical picture:
The first city we see in the Bible is established by Cain, and named after his son Enoch. Interestingly, Cain used work the soil and Abel herded animals. When God cursed Cain, he said the soil would be hard to work - Cain then moved from being a farmer to an urban dweller. There's a rural -> urban trajectory going on here, but it's not all a result of righteousness.
2. Human History is Mostly Rural
This is statistically obvious:
- Prior to 2007, more people were rural than urban. Around 2007 marked the 50/50 tipping point.
- In 1900, only 13% of the world's population was urban!
- Many countries still have high levels of rural population, while most "developed" countries have very low levels of rural living. All the global statistics are here.
- The current trend globally is a very, very rapid urbanisation which is one of the great risks to humanity. Some see it becoming self-regulating:
From
this very informative Wikipedia article:
French economist Philippe Bocquier, writing in THE FUTURIST magazine, has calculated that "the proportion of the world population living in cities and towns in the year 2030 would be roughly 50%, substantially less than the 60% forecast by the United Nations (UN), because the messiness of rapid urbanization is unsustainable. Both Bocquier and the UN see more people flocking to cities, but Bocquier sees many of them likely to leave upon discovering that there’s no work for them and no place to live."
3. The American Scenario
In 1790, America's population was 95% rural, and it remained mostly rural until the 20th century. The population of the USA is now well over 80% urban, and this is still increasing at 1.3% per year.
It makes sense, in that culture, to plant churches in big cities - but this doesn't mean that the demography is that way because of God's will! And it certainly doesn't mean that it's God's will for every country to become almost entirely urban!
In such an urbanised country, food is either imported (as in the case of many countries at the top
of the list), or it is grown by a few massive industrialised companies using unsustainable energy-hungry, water-hungry techniques. The latter is the case in the USA.
Wikipedia articles
like this one are useful in understanding some of the concerns, such as the dependence of modern agriculture upon fossil fuels which are fast running out. Movies like
Food Inc. are also good ways to understand problems such as the USA's subsidies for corn, which then goes into an unbelievable number of products as well as being fed to cows in ridiculous feedlots, creating bacteria-ridden meat (which is solved by washing in ammonia!). It's a system that depends upon chickens being grown in such crowded conditions that they never move and cannot even walk, and a system that depends upon gross injustice in huge abattoirs where illegal workers are paid tiny wages and work with so much meat that their fingernails fall out - then are herded up and arrested when it is politically expedient.
Do we understand this to be God's will, and the trajectory of the Biblical story from Eden to New Jerusalem? Is it really OK to move from having farmers and artisans to having food and goods produced by massive industrialised processes and the majority of the population doing desk jobs? There was a time when people went for holidays to farms; now laws are being passed to protect the secrecy of the food industry in the USA because it is too hideous for the public to know about!
No, I don't believe God's purposes are urban at all. God loves city-dwellers, and he loves farmers, and Christians should definitely establish churches in areas with high population, but we must never use our own cultural scenario as a template through which to view God's purposes for the world.
Labels: Gospel and Agriculture, Tim Keller